Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know I can link folders in /home/fancyusername to a folder on an NTFS partition, but would it be safe to store an entire /home/blabla in this same manner?

Would the system choke up on permissions? I'm asking because our system got damaged in a hurricane (fried) and the only bootable drive (so far) is a 3GB drive! I've got maverick on it, but need to get space for other users, espc my father, so we can get our Church information flowing etc.

This very critical so I can't take major risks. Any information would be useful.

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

NTFS is a POSIX-compatible filesystem, so it is possible with some work (related to permissions & user management).

OTOH, I don't think this is used very much, so it's not well-tested either...

share|improve this answer
thanks +)! As it's not tested (be me either) I'll avoid it for now. will accept once the timer expires. – RolandiXor Nov 1 '10 at 19:18

I'd recommend sticking to an ext3 or ext4 drive and then using symlinks for ~/Pictures ~/Videos etc to directories on a mounted-elsewhere NTFS drive (which would make your Places menu still work)

share|improve this answer
I was thinking of doing it that way, but hoping to avoid the extra work :( (time considered). guess I have little choice. thanks Maco – RolandiXor Nov 1 '10 at 19:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.