What are the advantages of using Shotwell? What are the disadvantages?
2 Answers
The specification for this decision is here
Here (Sorry, this show has been removed from Blip.) is a video clip where we discussed Shotwell (and other apps) at the Ubuntu Developer Summit.
Essentially the choice was made upstream (by Gnome). But there are a lot of advantages:
- No Mono
- It's lightweight and crash free
- Better integrated with the Gnome Desktop
- It has support for the RAW format
- Some basic editing capabilities
As stated on the comment above the elimination of Mono from the default install would be a huge bonus, less occupied space, and less conspiracy theories evolving Microsoft and .Net running about.
-
11Can you give some evidence that removing Mono was a strong motivating factor? That's a controversial reason, and you've listed it first and treated it at length. Jul 29, 2010 at 10:03
-
I don't think that was a strong motivating factor, in fact I think it had nothing to do. I said that would be a bonus, the free space on the install CD would be a real advantage. As for the religious conversations, they're just useless. Jul 29, 2010 at 11:20
-
-
Shotwell is just better. Better capabilities and a clear vision. It's going to be a great app very soon. Jul 31, 2010 at 5:34
-
I don't think GNOME upstream had anything to do with that choice : both f-spot and shotwell are photo managers for GNOME, but they don't have any kind of special status in the GNOME project or platform. One significant difference is that f-spot is hosted on GNOME infrastructure (git, bugzilla, etc.) Aug 2, 2010 at 9:34